sraun: portrait (Default)
sraun ([personal profile] sraun) wrote2007-09-30 11:56 am
Entry tags:

Webmail package recommendations?

Linux neepery ahead!

I'm currently using NeoMail connecting to local POP3 mailboxes, when I'm not using Mutt (I vastly prefer using Mutt!). I'm being forced to use the webmail if I want to read mail from work - they've blocked ssh & telnet from reaching the outside world, which means no Mutt. :-( I'm running into some ... limitations of NeoMail - it doesn't thread, it doesn't have a mass 'mark read' function that I can find.

So, what's your favorite 'install on my Linux box' webmail package? As I said, I'm currently using POP3, but could be convinced to change to IMAP. I'm currently running a Debian box - I can't get at it right this moment to tell if it's etch or lenny. Requirements are some degree of threading (preferably using the reply-to-message-id, but I'll take by subject), and mass action (at least mark read and move to another folder). I'd like something that used mboxes.

Note: use gmail/your web-mail provider of choice is not an option - I want my e-mail on my storage, not someone else's!
ext_8716: (Default)

[identity profile] trixtah.livejournal.com 2007-10-06 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
Damn, I meant to reply to this ages ago. Yes, I do understand your concerns about Gmail/Yahoo etc. I was rolling out my standard advice to people who have their mail hosted with their ISP (leave it on their servers), rather than people who maintain their own mail. Silly me.

Re the Roundcube, meh, bulk mail handling is one area that it's severely lacking on. You've probably already made your decision, but I think SquirrelMail would be best for your needs.
ext_8716: (Default)

[identity profile] trixtah.livejournal.com 2007-10-06 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
And that AjaxTerm looks really nice too! *off to check it out further*