Webmail package recommendations?
Sep. 30th, 2007 11:56 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Linux neepery ahead!
I'm currently using NeoMail connecting to local POP3 mailboxes, when I'm not using Mutt (I vastly prefer using Mutt!). I'm being forced to use the webmail if I want to read mail from work - they've blocked ssh & telnet from reaching the outside world, which means no Mutt. :-( I'm running into some ... limitations of NeoMail - it doesn't thread, it doesn't have a mass 'mark read' function that I can find.
So, what's your favorite 'install on my Linux box' webmail package? As I said, I'm currently using POP3, but could be convinced to change to IMAP. I'm currently running a Debian box - I can't get at it right this moment to tell if it's etch or lenny. Requirements are some degree of threading (preferably using the reply-to-message-id, but I'll take by subject), and mass action (at least mark read and move to another folder). I'd like something that used mboxes.
Note: use gmail/your web-mail provider of choice is not an option - I want my e-mail on my storage, not someone else's!
I'm currently using NeoMail connecting to local POP3 mailboxes, when I'm not using Mutt (I vastly prefer using Mutt!). I'm being forced to use the webmail if I want to read mail from work - they've blocked ssh & telnet from reaching the outside world, which means no Mutt. :-( I'm running into some ... limitations of NeoMail - it doesn't thread, it doesn't have a mass 'mark read' function that I can find.
So, what's your favorite 'install on my Linux box' webmail package? As I said, I'm currently using POP3, but could be convinced to change to IMAP. I'm currently running a Debian box - I can't get at it right this moment to tell if it's etch or lenny. Requirements are some degree of threading (preferably using the reply-to-message-id, but I'll take by subject), and mass action (at least mark read and move to another folder). I'd like something that used mboxes.
Note: use gmail/your web-mail provider of choice is not an option - I want my e-mail on my storage, not someone else's!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-01 09:01 pm (UTC)gmail/yahoo/etc. push some of my privacy/responsibility buttons. I don't want to have to trust that their business model won't change and they'll start using my data for their purposes. Yahoo had a really nasty service agreement for a while - as written, it said that the copyright for any posting to a Yahoo Group belonged to Yahoo. (IIRC, that lasted for no more than a couple of weeks before it was modified, but still...)
And why should I trust that they'll do backups of my data if I'm not paying them?
Does Roundcube have my requested features? Essentially mass-mark-read and mass-move - oh, and I discovered that I'm also missing mark-unread.
In a different fora, someone pointed me at an alternative solution I'm going to investigate first - AjaxTerm. A terminal package that runs ... inside? my web browser - I'd have to get SSL working, but that's been on my list for a while anyway.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-06 01:00 am (UTC)Re the Roundcube, meh, bulk mail handling is one area that it's severely lacking on. You've probably already made your decision, but I think SquirrelMail would be best for your needs.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-06 01:01 am (UTC)