sraun: portrait (Default)
[personal profile] sraun

You Passed 8th Grade Math

Congratulations, you got 10/10 correct!

Date: 2005-10-23 10:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jimtbari.livejournal.com
When I took it, one of the questions had two possible answers:
If .4 < x < 1/2, x could equal:

* 40%
* None of the above
* 45%
* 50%
I suppose blogthings randomizes the possible answers.


Date: 2005-10-23 10:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adina-atl.livejournal.com
???

What are the two possible answers you see? X cannot be 40%, because .4 is not *less than* .4. X cannot be 50%, because .5 is not *greater than* .5. It's the difference between "greater than" and "greater than or equal."

Date: 2005-10-23 10:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jimtbari.livejournal.com
You appear to be using a much different definition of "above" than I am. ;-)
It's not 40%, so "none of the above" is correct. They should have said "none of these".

Date: 2005-10-23 10:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frostfox.livejournal.com
I got an F.

But then I got a grade 4 in CSE Maths in 1979 (they give you a grade 5 for writing your name on the paper).
I have number blindness to go with my dyslexia, I think.

But I have other redeeming skills, apart from maths and spelling.

FF

Date: 2005-10-23 10:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adina-atl.livejournal.com
Ah. A legalist. *grin*

Date: 2005-10-23 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] countrycousin.livejournal.com
I don't recall where "none of the above" was on mine ;<), but I have a comparably subtle complaint.

One of the questions was about -2 and two of the choices were "integer" and "whole number". There seems to be general agreement about the definition of integer and agreement about counting number and natural number (modulo inclusion of zero), but some people seem to use "whole number" as integer and some seem to use it as natural number.

I would say that is a bad question for an eighth grader. Use of terms for which there is general agreement seems much more appropriate.

(drat! those nits are tiny . . .)

Date: 2005-10-23 11:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] countrycousin.livejournal.com
They should have said "none of these".

None of the others??

(*&#*&@# nits) :<) . . .

Date: 2005-10-23 11:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jimtbari.livejournal.com
Heh. Excellent point!

Date: 2005-10-27 06:16 am (UTC)
ext_5149: (Scandinavian)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
Just to disagree, I remember learning the "whole number" vs. integer thing back in the 4th grade. It is not a great question given the confusion around what is or is not a whole number, but it seemed pretty obvious to go with the one that was definitely correct instead of the one that might be correct. Really the whole thing seemed rather basic, more 6th grade than 8th grade, and I did not go to a great school.

Date: 2005-10-28 03:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] countrycousin.livejournal.com
heh. My education was well before "new math" and my memory is not that good (but surely I was given the appropriate definitions many times in college and later). I reasoned as you did, but more clumsily :<). I'll give myself 9.6 and the test 9.3 :<). You get the full 10 :<) . .

Profile

sraun: portrait (Default)
sraun

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 3rd, 2026 09:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios