On the other hand, I did have a fun playing Advanced Civilization yesterday!

[sraun]

davidwilford, David C, Don B, and Jonathan A (WANOLJ) all came over to my house to play Advanced Civilization (the board game). I had an announced 'get here' time of 12N, we probably actually got started about 12:30-12:45, and finished just shy of 10pm.

By the rules, it was supposed to be three map boards and 47 population tokens. We decided to try four map boards and 55 tokens. It gave us elbow room.

Don played Egypt, Jonathan played Babylon.

David C played Illyria and nicely illustrated the fact that the game does punish you if you get too spread out. He came in dead last - his final score was less than half that of the fourth place finisher.

davidwilford played Crete, and marched straight through to the end without getting stopped on the Archaeological Succession Table (AST) once.

I played Assyria, and semi-purposely took a hit on the AST at the second barrier (three cities, 9 Civ cards, all five Civ card groups). I think this make my overall game much easier - it didn't look like I was doing as well as I really was. Also, I set myself up in Asia Minor, negotiated a border with Jonathan early, and we backed up the border with a row of cities. I was able to have a nice stable contained civilization - it didn't grow to speak of, but didn't shrink either. It looked smaller than most everyone else's, and I wasn't being a threat to anyone.

Everyone else did claim that I was very good at trading.

Jonathan and davidwilford both said they needed to improve their Trade Card trading skills. I think it was more true of Jonathan than davidwilford.

I ended up winning by almost 500 points, or a margin of ~15%. IIRC, David W was next, then Jonathan, then Don, then David C. I am unreasonably pleased with myself.

I almost forgot - thanks to davidwilford to the nice maps!

Comments

[selenite.livejournal.com]

I'd love to dust off my AdvCiv box someday. Glad you had a good time!

[stoutfellow.livejournal.com]

I have a vague memory of playing a board game by that name (well, probably just "Civilization") back when I was in high school - early '70s. Could it be the same game? (I don't remember it well enough to tell whether the details you give match the memory.)

[selenite.livejournal.com]

Any of these pictures look familiar?
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/images/thing/71/civilization

[stoutfellow.livejournal.com]

Mm, no, not really. This link (http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/71/civilization) says that it was published in 1980, so I must be thinking of something else. Oh, well.

[sraun]

Well, I first played Civ in early 80's, and it wasn't a new game at the time. IIRC, Advanced Civ came out in the mid 80's. So, early 70's is possible for it.

[davidwilford.livejournal.com]

You're welcome to the Civ maps and I was pleased we could use one, even if it did have a mistake that affected Illyria.

I picked Crete partly because if I was ever going to learn how to play it for the first time ever, it was easier to play with more room and stock. I made a few mistakes (like leaving one unit behind on Crete when I first moved to the mainland, which did slow me down) and didn't use my ships very well at first, but later I found how much fun it could be to move five units four or five spaces when needed, rather than having to slog them overland. I'd play Crete again now, although I doubt I'd be so lucky as yesterday when I didn't get the Volcano calamity even once!