Boggle. That's just weird... "Legitimate sword owners understand the importance of ensuring that their swords do not fall into the wrong hands," Mr Haermeyer said.
"It's clear that the majority of Victorians back the push to keep swords off the streets," he said.
Now the SCA will really be in a position to launch a coup, what with this disarmed populace and all...
... and, as I blogged, some of the use of language is awfully familiar to those of use who've followed, err, other issues. I was tempted to parody it -- "Why would anybody need an assault swords?" / "sword-related deaths" / "Do you want every fender-bender to turn into a swordfight?" / "child-safety sword locks" / "high capacity scabbards" / "we need to close the sword show loophole". . . .
. . . but it's awfully good as a parody the way it is.
I've never been to Australia in general or Victoria in particular, so I don't know if dueling with swords is really a problem there.
That said, sure, if they do manage to actually suppress sword ownership, Aussies who want to duel and can't find a sword will have to use pointed sticks, chainsaws, koala bears, or vats of bubbling oil.
Yep. My brother, the sword-carrying airhead mediaeval re-enactor, has been working with his group to get people to calm down about it. He says that it just means he and other mediaevalists have to get permits when they enter Victoria (not Australia) but apart from that it's not a big deal.
It is to stop the Melbourne gangs' latest trick of ordering ornamental swords from those decorative swordshops, sharpening up the blades and using them. (Which is actually very doable. My dad got a Masonic sword from a shop in Perth that my brother says would be a passable blade if anyone put an edge on it.)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 01:49 pm (UTC)"Legitimate sword owners understand the importance of ensuring that their swords do not fall into the wrong hands," Mr Haermeyer said.
"It's clear that the majority of Victorians back the push to keep swords off the streets," he said.
Now the SCA will really be in a position to launch a coup, what with this disarmed populace and all...
It's pretty remarkable...
Date: 2004-03-09 01:54 pm (UTC). . . but it's awfully good as a parody the way it is.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 06:31 pm (UTC)This will make dueling more rare, though.
Dueling?
Date: 2004-03-12 04:39 pm (UTC)That said, sure, if they do manage to actually suppress sword ownership, Aussies who want to duel and can't find a sword will have to use pointed sticks, chainsaws, koala bears, or vats of bubbling oil.
Re: Dueling?
Date: 2004-03-12 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 09:04 pm (UTC)sword-carrying airheadmediaeval re-enactor, has been working with his group to get people to calm down about it. He says that it just means he and other mediaevalists have to get permits when they enter Victoria (not Australia) but apart from that it's not a big deal.It is to stop the Melbourne gangs' latest trick of ordering ornamental swords from those decorative swordshops, sharpening up the blades and using them. (Which is actually very doable. My dad got a Masonic sword from a shop in Perth that my brother says would be a passable blade if anyone put an edge on it.)